@Thatsregrettab1 @IPlayedD1 @ConsensusNLP @sciscore The training data is described in two papers: Menke et al 2020, 2022 (https://t.co/CKF4yLkn7u). Things to note, the average paper in 2020 scores a 4/10, the cancer reproducibility project found that the p
RT @neuinfo: Is rigor of the scientific literature getting better over time in your country or your institution? Probably according to the…
RT @preclinicaldata: A new article describes the latest version of @sciscore's Rigor and Transparency Index (RTI), a research reporting met…
A new article describes the latest version of @sciscore's Rigor and Transparency Index (RTI), a research reporting metric that reflects research quality and reporting transparency, examining research reporting trends over time in the biomedical sciences. h
RT @MedThinkSciCom: New approaches to enhance scientific rigor/transparency are being actively pursued. via @jmirpub https://t.co/73givxtgom
New approaches to enhance scientific rigor/transparency are being actively pursued. via @jmirpub https://t.co/73givxtgom
RT @Anitabandrowski: Wow, guess news people like metrics... https://t.co/n4KAmNCtcX https://t.co/CKF4yLjPhW
Wow, guess news people like metrics... https://t.co/n4KAmNCtcX https://t.co/CKF4yLjPhW
RT @NIH_ORIP: Read: Establishing Institutional Scores with the Rigor and Transparency Index: Large-scale Analysis of Scientific Reporting Q…
RT @sciscore: "Research reproducibility is necessary for scientific progress" https://t.co/jqHwHLqdZA @JMIRPub @mathein @Anitabandrowski @s…
Read: Establishing Institutional Scores with the Rigor and Transparency Index: Large-scale Analysis of Scientific Reporting Quality @Anitabandrowski @SciCrunch #reproducibility https://t.co/Uz8Drz0uTP
@LudoWaltman Well done, important topic indeed! Curious, what about investigator bias...? There is still plenty of that around in various scholarly papers (~50-60%), see: https://t.co/hmUPaU9EOU
RT @sciscore: "Research reproducibility is necessary for scientific progress" https://t.co/jqHwHLqdZA @JMIRPub @mathein @Anitabandrowski @s…
RT @sciscore: "Research reproducibility is necessary for scientific progress" https://t.co/jqHwHLqdZA @JMIRPub @mathein @Anitabandrowski @s…
RT @neuinfo: Is rigor of the scientific literature getting better over time in your country or your institution? Probably according to the…
"Research reproducibility is necessary for scientific progress" https://t.co/jqHwHLqdZA @JMIRPub @mathein @Anitabandrowski @sciscore https://t.co/2R8aj7y5HV via @EurekAlert @jmirpub
Valuable dataset showing #cellline authentication improving, but slowly. Agree with @Anitabandrowski that it’s essential to report if cell lines are male or female; failure to do so is not new, but worrying nonetheless #CellCulture
@sciscore analysis of scientific reporting quality - gave our journal a score of 3.66 - yet we publish no pre-clinical biomedical research - perhaps adjustments or removal of journals out of scope should be done. Can studies on peer review or RI score 10?
#Rigor and transparency index: Large-scale analysis of scientific reporting quality https://t.co/gGMD8yiXkE https://t.co/UMPuWLSD8Z
RT @neuinfo: Is rigor of the scientific literature getting better over time in your country or your institution? Probably according to the…
@Cell_Detective @Cellosaurus Cell line authentication reporting is getting better, but has a very very long way to go. Check out Figure 5 https://t.co/CKF4yLjPhW ps. nobody likes to report sex of cell lines. ...problem?
RT @BrianNosek: Woah, compelling figure. Now I have to read it! I am immediately interested in SciScore finding the RR's to be scored high…
RT @cohenbioscience: In a new large-scale analysis of scientific reporting quality, measurements showed a trend of general improvement in r…
RT @sciscore: Bonus: watch the author video featuring @Anitabandrowski and @mathein discussing the findings of their latest paper in @JMIR_…
RT @sciscore: Bonus: watch the author video featuring @Anitabandrowski and @mathein discussing the findings of their latest paper in @JMIR_…
RT @sciscore: Bonus: watch the author video featuring @Anitabandrowski and @mathein discussing the findings of their latest paper in @JMIR_…
Bonus: watch the author video featuring @Anitabandrowski and @mathein discussing the findings of their latest paper in @JMIR_: https://t.co/TYnVPQRAIj https://t.co/Y122rKF3Fa
RT @cohenbioscience: In a new large-scale analysis of scientific reporting quality, measurements showed a trend of general improvement in r…
RT @cohenbioscience: In a new large-scale analysis of scientific reporting quality, measurements showed a trend of general improvement in r…
RT @cohenbioscience: In a new large-scale analysis of scientific reporting quality, measurements showed a trend of general improvement in r…
In a new large-scale analysis of scientific reporting quality, measurements showed a trend of general improvement in rigor and transparency, according to the Rigor and Transparency Index. https://t.co/twlGcd0sWk #openscience #sciencetwitter
LOL our own robot tweeted this paper and it was retweeted. Thank you twitterverse!
RT @RobotRrid: The authors of "Establishing Institutional Scores With the Rigor a…" (https://t.co/mSkYtgjke6) included RRIDs in their paper…
RT @RobotRrid: The authors of "Establishing Institutional Scores With the Rigor a…" (https://t.co/mSkYtgjke6) included RRIDs in their paper…
The authors of "Establishing Institutional Scores With the Rigor a…" (https://t.co/mSkYtgjke6) included RRIDs in their paper! RRIDs like this improve reproducibility in scientific research. #ReproducibleResearch #OpenScience
Establishing Institutional Scores With the Rigor and Transparency Index: Large-scale Analysis of Scientific Reporting Quality https://t.co/3fj1aioNmv #reproducibility #scientific literature
RT @petersuber: Another example of text-mining #openaccess articles (because non-OA articles are unavailable for mining) and excluding #PDF…
RT @petersuber: Another example of text-mining #openaccess articles (because non-OA articles are unavailable for mining) and excluding #PDF…
RT @iainh_z: Neat figure showing availability of data, code and protocols supporting papers in PubMed Central 1997-2020, from this new pape…
RT @Anitabandrowski: @BrianNosek check out what we did with your awesome data #CancerReproducibility in our new paper: https://t.co/agcFWYJ…
RT @BrianNosek: Woah, compelling figure. Now I have to read it! I am immediately interested in SciScore finding the RR's to be scored high…
RT @petersuber: Another example of text-mining #openaccess articles (because non-OA articles are unavailable for mining) and excluding #PDF…
RT @petersuber: Another example of text-mining #openaccess articles (because non-OA articles are unavailable for mining) and excluding #PDF…
Establishing Institutional Scores With the Rigor and Transparency Index: Large-scale Analysis of Scientific Reporting Quality https://t.co/OXE0fiXCms
RT @petersuber: Another example of text-mining #openaccess articles (because non-OA articles are unavailable for mining) and excluding #PDF…
Another example of text-mining #openaccess articles (because non-OA articles are unavailable for mining) and excluding #PDFs because they are unfriendly to mining. https://t.co/Xgjbjl0qzf Short lesson: To facilitate research, always make new work OA and n
RT @iainh_z: Neat figure showing availability of data, code and protocols supporting papers in PubMed Central 1997-2020, from this new pape…
RT @BrianNosek: Woah, compelling figure. Now I have to read it! I am immediately interested in SciScore finding the RR's to be scored high…
RT @Anitabandrowski: @BrianNosek check out what we did with your awesome data #CancerReproducibility in our new paper: https://t.co/agcFWYJ…
RT @BrianNosek: Woah, compelling figure. Now I have to read it! I am immediately interested in SciScore finding the RR's to be scored high…
Neat figure showing availability of data, code and protocols supporting papers in PubMed Central 1997-2020, from this new paper: https://t.co/91RVVfpTIC Note axis for data and code is 0-20% and that for protocols it is absolute numbers not %ages; see metho
RT @BrianNosek: Woah, compelling figure. Now I have to read it! I am immediately interested in SciScore finding the RR's to be scored high…
RT @neuinfo: Is rigor of the scientific literature getting better over time in your country or your institution? Probably according to the…
RT @Anitabandrowski: @BrianNosek check out what we did with your awesome data #CancerReproducibility in our new paper: https://t.co/agcFWYJ…
RT @neuinfo: Is rigor of the scientific literature getting better over time in your country or your institution? Probably according to the…
RT @neuinfo: Is rigor of the scientific literature getting better over time in your country or your institution? Probably according to the…
Is rigor of the scientific literature getting better over time in your country or your institution? Probably according to the authors of recent paper establishing the Rigor and Transparency Index for institutions (and countries). https://t.co/PgMkSWXJns h
RT @BrianNosek: Woah, compelling figure. Now I have to read it! I am immediately interested in SciScore finding the RR's to be scored high…
Woah, compelling figure. Now I have to read it! I am immediately interested in SciScore finding the RR's to be scored higher than the original paper when they included only methods, and then the replication study increasing after outcomes were reported in
@BrianNosek check out what we did with your awesome data #CancerReproducibility in our new paper: https://t.co/agcFWYJSRK So it looks like SciScore is still highly sensitive to detecting more reproducible papers. https://t.co/RCpdVAAKKa
RT @AdrianStanley13: Article published today in JMIR Publications from co-authors @Anitabandrowski, @mathein and some of the SciScore team,…
RT @AdrianStanley13: Article published today in JMIR Publications from co-authors @Anitabandrowski, @mathein and some of the SciScore team,…
#NLP "Establishing Institutional Scores With the Rigor and Transparency Index: Large-scale Analysis of Scientific Reporting Quality" https://t.co/Aev58zz8Ut
RT @jmirpub: New in JMIR: Establishing Institutional Scores With the Rigor and Transparency Index: Large-scale Analysis of Scientific Repor…
New in JMIR: Establishing Institutional Scores With the Rigor and Transparency Index: Large-scale Analysis of Scientific Reporting Quality https://t.co/7xopkC8FmO https://t.co/ulOfJJ3Kx7
Establishing Institutional Scores With the Rigor and Transparency Index: Large-scale Analysis of Scientific Reporting Quality https://t.co/Vl9aBYSlI1 https://t.co/j4v1K4nf62