The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
An Evaluation Service for Digital Public Health Interventions: User-Centered Design Approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medical Internet Research, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.2196/28356 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kassandra Karpathakis, Gene Libow, Henry W W Potts, Simon Dixon, Felix Greaves, Elizabeth Murray |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 25% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 16 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 64% |
| Scientists | 5 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 88 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Researcher | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 49 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 8 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 5% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 51 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,086,244
of 26,588,565 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Internet Research
#1,698
of 8,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,579
of 439,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Internet Research
#42
of 308 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,588,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,324 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 308 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.