↓ Skip to main content

An Evaluation Service for Digital Public Health Interventions: User-Centered Design Approach

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Internet Research, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
34 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
An Evaluation Service for Digital Public Health Interventions: User-Centered Design Approach
Published in
Journal of Medical Internet Research, September 2021
DOI 10.2196/28356
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kassandra Karpathakis, Gene Libow, Henry W W Potts, Simon Dixon, Felix Greaves, Elizabeth Murray

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 17%
Other 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Librarian 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 5 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 17%
Social Sciences 2 11%
Psychology 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 5 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,116,600
of 20,109,407 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Internet Research
#983
of 5,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,931
of 339,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Internet Research
#9
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,109,407 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,972 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.