The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Associations Between Exposure to and Expression of Negative Opinions About Human Papillomavirus Vaccines on Social Media: An Observational Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medical Internet Research, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.2196/jmir.4343 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adam G Dunn, Julie Leask, Xujuan Zhou, Kenneth D Mandl, Enrico Coiera |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 9% |
| Australia | 4 | 6% |
| India | 2 | 3% |
| Japan | 2 | 3% |
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 46 | 72% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 44 | 69% |
| Scientists | 10 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 16% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 309 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 308 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 60 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 15% |
| Researcher | 30 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 53 | 17% |
| Unknown | 74 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 42 | 14% |
| Psychology | 27 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 62 | 20% |
| Unknown | 93 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 91. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2022.
All research outputs
#492,934
of 26,367,306 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Internet Research
#320
of 8,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,147
of 281,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Internet Research
#2
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,367,306 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,161 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,069 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.